Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp HEAD as 9.1devel.

On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>> How long should I wait before I start breaking things?
>>>>
>>>> Did you have any particular breakage in mind?
>>
>>> Well, you can see for yourself what I've submitted for the next CF.
>>
>> You might want to hold off on the get_whatever_oid patches for a bit,
>> but the other stuff I see there looks pretty localized.  No objection
>> to pressing forward with CF work otherwise.
>
> I can hold off on those for a bit - I don't think there will be enough
> drift to matter very much, but if it makes you more comfortable, it's
> not a big deal.

I checked on these patches today and there was only one, quite trivial
conflict (and the relevant patch was not even something that was
back-patched).  So I think there is not much reason to hold off any
longer on committing these.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company