Re: SSI bug?
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SSI bug? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTimgy7xgS0zdC0LiU=5zgsSGwKGTaPppeza7WAQb@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SSI bug? ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Ответы |
Re: SSI bug?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote: > "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote: > >> I'm still looking at whether it's sane to try to issue a warning >> when an HTAB exceeds the number of entries declared as its >> max_size when it was created. > > I think this does it. > > If nothing else, it might be instructive to use it while testing the > SSI patch. Would it make any sense to slip this into 9.1, or should > I add it to the first 9.2 CF? I don't think it's too late to commit something like this, but I'm not clear on whether we want it. Is this checking for what should be a can't-happen case, or are these soft limits that we expect to be exceeded from time to time? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: