Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTimgn_nRwgknooswZqVdXYHCCD59BrW77mN0dq0s@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects (Shigeru HANADA <hanada@metrosystems.co.jp>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Shigeru HANADA <hanada@metrosystems.co.jp> wrote: > On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:24:27 -0400 > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> Attached. Foreign tables are already OK, I believe; it's only foreign >> data wrappers and foreign servers that appear to need fixing. > > The patch seems good for basic functionarity. I've tested the patch > and noticed that get_foreign_data_wrapper_oid() is same as > GetForeignDataWrapperOidByName(), so they could be merged. Also > GetForeignServerOidByName() could be merged. > > I changed "foreign data wrapper" in message to "foreign-data wrapper" > for consistency, but it's revertable. > > Please see merge_oid_funcs.patch which can be applied onto your patch. Thanks for the review, good catches. Committed those two patches together with a bit of further rearrangement. > I think some supports can be added for comments on SQL/MED objects. > > - pg_dump support for comment on fdw and server > - psql describe commands (\dew+ and \des+) > - psql TAB completion > > Please see attached patches for each feature. I'll take a look at these next. > While testing pg_dump, I noticed that comment of extension's member > objects are not dumped by pg_dump. Those comments should be dumped > after CREATE EXTENSION statement? No, I don't believe that would be correct. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: