Re: Query history mystery box
От | Thom Brown |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Query history mystery box |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTimeQKb+p80Y0wmM3nUHkFyqVPs7rdr4OCOSWwTB@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Query history mystery box (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Query history mystery box
|
Список | pgadmin-support |
On 21 September 2010 21:40, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: > Le 21/09/2010 22:05, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit : >> Le 21/09/2010 14:37, Thom Brown a écrit : >>> On 21 September 2010 13:31, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: >>>> Le 21/09/2010 14:25, Thom Brown a écrit : >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I think the query history box should be labelled, or at least have a >>>>> tooltip. A colleague of mine was confused by the presence of the new >>>>> drop-down box with no indication as to what this was. And to make >>>>> matters worse, when he went to the help guide, the screenshot doesn't >>>>> show this drop-down. >>>>> >>>> >>>> The documentation is not good. We need to work on that for next release. >>>> One of the issues we are facing is the format we should use. Right now, >>>> every thing is a mixed of PHP and HTML, which is great for translation, >>>> but bad if we want to find writers that aren't coders too. >>>> >>>> But before that, updating some screenshots would be a pretty good idea. >>>> Everyone is welcomed to contribute this way. >>>> >>>>> Could it be made clearer what the function of this box is. Like >>>>> "Previous queries" or "Statement history". And update the help to >>>>> show this with an explaination as to its function? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Could be done, yeah. If you think it's much better for the user, that's >>>> something quite easy and quick to do. >>> >>> Yes, I think it's pretty much essential as otherwise it leaves the >>> user to guess as to its function. Another idea is for it to say >>> "Select From Statement History" as the default entry (if there is a >>> history to select from), and whatever the user selects from the >>> history overwrite this. >>> >> >> Nope. Attached is a patch that adds a tooltip... >> >>> And it appears the user can type stuff into this field too. Shouldn't >>> that be non-editable? >>> >> >> ... and makes the combobox read-only. >> >> I'm gonna work on another patch to add a label, but it will be for the >> next release. >> > > See the screenshot attached. Seems good to you? > > Patch attached. That's perfect! Yes, I think that'll make its function clear. Thanks Guillaume. :) -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935
В списке pgadmin-support по дате отправления: