Re: psql: Add \dL to show languages
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql: Add \dL to show languages |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTimdwvjm2tQp8L1pEx-oJu4gphPgRLYCp4MtCVOX@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql: Add \dL to show languages (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql: Add \dL to show languages
Re: psql: Add \dL to show languages |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 05:22, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >>>>> I do not like the use of parentheses in the usage description "list >>>>> (procedural) languages". Why not have it simply as "list procedural >>>>> languages"? >>>> >>>> Because it lists non-procedural langauges as well? (I didn't check it, >>>> that's just a guess) >>> >>> There are many places in our code and documentation where "procedural >>> language" or "language" are treated as synonyms. There's no semantic >>> difference; procedural is simply a noise word. >> >> [bikeshedding] >> >> I agree with Andreas' suggestion that the help string be "list >> procedural languages", even though the \dLS output looks something >> like this: >> >> List of languages >> Procedural Language | Owner | Trusted >> ---------------------+-------+--------- >> c | josh | f >> internal | josh | f >> plpgsql | josh | t >> sql | josh | t >> (4 rows) > > By the by, in the output of \df, \dt, \db, etc., that first column is > called simply "Name". +1 for just using "name" >> which, as Magnus points out, includes non-procedural languages (SQL). >> >> I think that "list languages" could be confusing to newcomers -- the >> very people who might be reading through the help output of psql for >> the first time -- who might suppose that "languages" has something to >> do with the character sets supported by PostgreSQL, and might not even >> be aware that a variety of procedural languages can be used inside the >> database. > > Fair point. Yeah. Procedural langauges may strictly be wrong, but people aren't likely to misunderstand it. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: