Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTimcmJdqDR5GSOh-iWAkUZkE+7M1mojY7iRF=RU3@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 19:49, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 29, 2010, at 10:14 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >> We can be held responsible for the packaging decisions if they use >> *our* "make install" commands, imho. > > Yep. So, as I see it there are two ways of doing it - install a catversion.h file and include it from libpq-fe.h, or modify the libpq-fe.h. I still think modifying libpq-fe.h is the better of these choices - but either of them would work. But is the catversion value really the best interface for the user? This is about libpq functionality level, which really has nothing to do with the backend catalog, does it? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: