Re: WIP: extensible enums
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP: extensible enums |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTimcZwMOx3s6hkoaX-J7kT9mn_QVsK47HOq8Hm4L@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP: extensible enums (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIP: extensible enums
Re: WIP: extensible enums |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: > Well a bit more testing shows some benefit. I've sorted out a few kinks, so > this seems to work. In particular, with the above tables, the version > imported from 9.0 can create have an index created in about the same time as > on the fresh table (identical data, but all even numbered Oids). > > Of course, with lots of odd numbered Oids, if a label gets added the > imported version will degrade in performance much more quickly. I'm quite impressed by the amount of time and thought being put into optimizing this. I didn't realize people cared so much about enum performance; but it's good that they do. I hope to see more such efforts in other parts of the system. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: