Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make S_IRGRP etc available in mingw builds as well as MSVC.
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make S_IRGRP etc available in mingw builds as well as MSVC. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTimc+9AHFngDvaOoz-5=2=kdH6ts2X4-=_hO_ZFT@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make S_IRGRP etc available in mingw builds as well as MSVC. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make S_IRGRP etc available in mingw builds as well as MSVC.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 19:54, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >> On 12/12/2010 01:43 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> (Hm, I wonder whether BCC defines them either...) > >> Is anyone building the client stuff with BCC any more? I don't recall >> having heard of anyone doing so for quite some years. > > It's a fair question. We could clean up some of these messy ifdefs > if we dropped support for that combination. I assume that an MSVC-built > libpq.dll would still work for Borland users, no? The dynamic one, yes. Static linked one, no. IIRC I suggest desupporting it every now and then and get voted down ;) And quite often we have someone showing up around the x.y.2 release to clean it up so it works again... -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: