Re: Indent authentication overloading
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Indent authentication overloading |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTimbGBEBwsbRAvJKssTMGqWG-sXAWiXCOaqr_vh-@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Indent authentication overloading (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Indent authentication overloading
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 19:41, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > >>> I thought the proposal on the table was to add "peer" (or some other >>> name) to refer to the unix-socket auth method, and use that term >>> preferentially in the docs, while continuing to accept "ident" as an >>> old name for it. Is that really too confusing? > > What about the pg_ident file? Are we going to rename it? Are we We should've done that long ago - it's already used for things that aren't ident. If anything, it should be pg_usermap.conf. > (better) going to have separate files for pg_peer and pg_ident? Why? It already supports multiple maps... -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: