Re: Linux: PAE or x64
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Linux: PAE or x64 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTimb3CAF62jY15x8Gjza=0ek=141_-JZR8HdSEOL@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Linux: PAE or x64 (Peter Geoghegan <peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Linux: PAE or x64
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Peter Geoghegan <peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com> wrote: > Actually, there is a 64-bit port for windows now. I don't think I > misrepresented Magnus - the post suggested that the then-lack of a > 64-bit windows port wasn't a pressing issue, and that various > technical considerations *partially* justified there not being one at > the time (the word size of binaries, and more importantly PG's > architecture). It's an assessment that I agreed with. Also there was (is?) the issue that the pg / shared memory system used on windows is apparently quite inefficient at using large amounts of memory, so there was no pressing need there for 64 bitness either.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: