Re: raid10 write performance
| От | Dave Crooke |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: raid10 write performance |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTimaA0LqPAmSi--K1FkQqPXqKLpFLyhucDMI4y-w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: raid10 write performance (Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Of course, no backup strategy is complete without testing a full restore onto bare hardware :-)
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net> wrote:
Justin Graf wrote:WAL on a separate spindle will make a HUGE difference in performance. TPS rates frequently double OR BETTER with WAL on a dedicated spindle.On 6/22/2010 4:31 AM, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote:Would moving WAL dir to separate disk help potentially ?Yes it can have a big impact.
Strongly recommended.
Be aware that you must pay CLOSE ATTENTION to your backup strategy if WAL is on a different physical disk. Snapshotting the data disk where WAL is on a separate spindle and backing it up **WILL NOT WORK** and **WILL** result in an non-restoreable backup.
The manual discusses this but it's easy to miss.... don't or you'll get a NASTY surprise if something goes wrong.....
-- Karl
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: