Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTim_uPP2AGj3M_Ki0Ubu_NEe14A0RWg7zfivO=qX@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: > Why not just say give me the snapshot currently held by process nnnn? > > And please, not temp files if possible. As far as I'm aware, the full snapshot doesn't normally exist in shared memory, hence the need for publication of some sort. We could dedicate a shared memory region for publication but then you have to decide how many slots to allocate, and any number you pick will be too many for some people and not enough for others, not to mention that shared memory is a fairly precious resource. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: