Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTimZDsYQRknQ9wpRh7EQx26pXZpSjXJjMvNx9z6B@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > On lör, 2011-01-01 at 00:05 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: >> Yeah, and I still believe that. I'm having difficulty coming up with >> a workable approach, though. > > I don't see anything wrong with having 20 or 30 messages of variants of > > "foo cannot be used on bar" > > without placeholders. Well, that's OK with me. It seems a little grotty, but manageably so.Questions: 1. Should we try to include the name of the object? If so, how? 2. Can we have a variant with an SQL-command-fragment parameter? %s cannot be used on views where %s might be CLUSTER, DROP COLUMN, etc. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: