Re: CPUs for new databases
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CPUs for new databases |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTimYOhqPmXDUj4qCD4YRfAYhnf57ieV9FXzS8vTC@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CPUs for new databases (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CPUs for new databases
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > On 10/26/10 6:14 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote: >> There was an earlier thread with >> Greg and I in it where we posted the memory bandwidth numbers for that >> machine and it was insane how much data all 48 cores could pump into / >> out of memory at the same time. > > Well, the next step then is to do some database server benchmarking. > > My experience has been that PostgreSQL scales poorly past 30 cores, or > even at lower levels depending on the workload. So it would be > interesting to see if the memory bandwidth on the AMDs makes up for our > scaling issues. Which OSes have you tested it on? And what hardware? For smaller operations, like pgbench, where a large amount of what you're working on fits in cache, I get near linear scaling right up to 48 cores. Overall performance increases til about 50 threads, then drops off to about 60 to 70% peak for the next hundred or so threads I add on.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: