Re: git: uh-oh

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 15:04, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 14:11, Max Bowsher <maxb@f2s.com> wrote:
>> On 20/08/10 12:55, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 13:50, Max Bowsher <maxb@f2s.com> wrote:
>>>> I have run cvs2git on the pgsql module of your CVS locally (is that the
>>>> right thing to convert?) if you'd like to compare notes on specific
>>>> parts of the conversion.
>>>
>>> Correct, that's the one. Can you put your repo up somewhere so we can
>>> look at it? Then I don't have to wait for my process to finish :D
>>
>> Placed at http://red-bean.com/~maxb/pgsql-test.git - about 230MB -
>> sorry, dumb transport only, but hopefully that's not an issue for this
>> use case.
>
> It does. I've pushed up a mirror to
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=git-migration-test.git;a=summary -
> that one is a lot faster to work with for me at least.
>
> I'm also going to run my branch-verification script on it to see that
> it deosn't mess any of that up - that one takes a few hours to run
> (mainly the fault of the cvs we compare to :D) - I'll get back to you
> when it's done.

That turned out to be a non-starter, since that clone doesn't have
expanded keywords. I'll run a new conversion with the same options
file used last time, and we can work off that.

I believe Robert had some comments/questions as well :-)


--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/