Re: Check constraints on non-immutable keys
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Check constraints on non-immutable keys |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTimXKQqWC7pldR3nlft_Rr_vk58P_DmfAA_Zdj1q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Check constraints on non-immutable keys (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Check constraints on non-immutable keys
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: >> <kibo> >> "The <search condition> shall simply contain a <boolean value >> expression> that is retrospectively deterministic." > >> This is then defined in a rather complex manner that ends up disallowing >> col > now() but allowing col < now(). >> </kibo> > > Oh, cute. Seems to have been added in SQL:2003. I guess somebody > nagged them about wanting to be able to write CHECK(col <= now()). > The detailed definition is amazingly laborious and yet limited, though, > as it basically doesn't address the problem except for that specific > case and close relatives. Well, solving the problem in general is equivalent to the halting problem, so... -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: