Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger
От | Alex Hunsaker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTimPr=9Zov-T4aqes_ryguuJPRJo355mn+jdDdpQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger (Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 13:43, Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > So your plan was to have some savepoint before each execute ? > > How would one rollback the latest transaction ? It is always rolled back. Its how plperl works today: create or replace function foo() returns int as $$ eval { spi_exec_query('create table uniq (num int primary key'); spi_exec_query('insert into uniq (num) values (1), (1);',1); }; if($@) {# do something ... $@ == "duplicate key value violates unique constraint "uniq_pkey" at line 2." warn $@; } # oh well do something else # note the transaction is _not_ aborted spi_exec_query('select 1;', 1); return 1; $$ language plperl; =# begin; =# select foo(); =# select 1; =# commit; It does not matter if you use eval or not, its always in a sub transaction. > I see. "exception when unique violation" in plpgsql does automatic > rollback to block start (matching BEGIN) so I assumed that your > try/except sample is designed to do something similar Basically, minus the rollback to start. Its per query.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: