Re: is sync rep stalled?
От | Aidan Van Dyk |
---|---|
Тема | Re: is sync rep stalled? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTimJGkpqb_AP3Pfn1_jWC8zRjNUJ0yCM_k_WmjMK@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: is sync rep stalled? (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: is sync rep stalled?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > I have one question for clarity: > > If we make all the transactions wait until specified standbys have > connected to the master, how do we take a base backup from the > master for those standbys? We seem to be unable to do that because > pg_start_backup also waits forever. Is this right? Well, in my *opinion*, if you've told the master to not "commit to" *anything* unless it's synchronously replicated, you should already have a synchronously replicating slave up and running. I'm happy with the docs saying (maybe some what more politely): Before configuring your master to be completly, wait-fully-synchronous, make sure you have a slave capable of being synchronous ready. Because if you've told it to never be un-synchronous, it won't be.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: