Re: Explicit psqlrc
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Explicit psqlrc |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTim8o=rZLcSz+DzAgBBFnAuxV3-MuE4Wn+5J7h7M@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Explicit psqlrc (David Christensen <david@endpoint.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Explicit psqlrc
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:06 PM, David Christensen <david@endpoint.com> wrote: > > On Jul 21, 2010, at 12:31 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >> Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of mié jul 21 10:24:26 -0400 2010: >>> On tis, 2010-07-20 at 11:48 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >>>> It's tempting to propose making .psqlrc apply only in interactive >>>> mode, period. But that would be an incompatibility with previous >>>> releases, and I'm not sure it's the behavior we want, either. >>> >>> What is a use case for having .psqlrc be read in noninteractive use? >> >> Even if there weren't one, why does it get applied to -f but not -c? >> They're both noninteractive. > > > So not to let the thread drop, it appears that we're faced with the following situation: Hmm. I thought we almost had consensus on changing the historical behavior of -c. If we do that, this all gets much simpler. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: