Re: multiset patch review
От | Itagaki Takahiro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: multiset patch review |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTim7S-3v3DmeRiYt01oZnXd5oTT2tV3vovUmayUK@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: multiset patch review (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: multiset patch review
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 20:49, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > I notice that this is adding keywords and syntax support for what is > basically a PostgreSQL extension (since we certainly can't possibly be > following the SQL standards given that we're not implementing a new > datatype. Is that really a good idea? As I wrote here, http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-01/msg00829.php I think we can follow the SQL standard incrementally because we have function overloads. One exception is the result type of collect() aggregate function. It returns an array for now, but will return a multiset when we support true multiset data type. -- Itagaki Takahiro
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: