casts: max double precision > text > double precision fails with out or range error
От | Maciej Sakrejda |
---|---|
Тема | casts: max double precision > text > double precision fails with out or range error |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTim5iE0rbRyJqQKeC=mNbV4a7BH8=zASiLAW+hrC@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: casts: max double precision > text > double precision fails with out or range error
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tried asking this in pgsql-general but I got no response, so I thought I'd give hackers a shot: postgres=# select (((1.7976931348623157081e+308)::double precision)::text)::double precision; ERROR: "1.79769313486232e+308" is out of range for type double precision I'm working on a pg driver and in my float data decoder functional tests, I ran into some errors that I eventually traced back to this behavior. Essentially, postgres seems to cast the max normal double (i.e., the bits of ~(1ULL<<52 | 1ULL<<63)) to text in such a manner that it's rounded up, and the reverse cast, text-to-double-precision, does not recognize it as being in range. Curiously, pg_dump seems to print doubles with more precision (in both COPY and INSERT modes), avoiding this issue. Of course I'm not expecting perfect precision in round-tripping doubles like this (this is always dicey with IEEE floating point anyway), but failing outright is a little ugly. Any thoughts? Version is PostgreSQL 8.4.6 on i486-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc-4.4.real (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) 4.4.3, 32-bit. Also, although the simplest way to illustrate this problem is with this round-trip set of casts, that's obviously a contrived use case. However, given that the same behavior is seen in the TEXT mode output for doubles of the FEBE protocol, I think it's a little more noteworthy. Thanks, Maciek Sakrejda
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: