Re: pg_basebackup for streaming base backups
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_basebackup for streaming base backups |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTim3Va6_5rL55i-qM-UAaEP1P3uZrtsowf=iwxVu@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_basebackup for streaming base backups (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_basebackup for streaming base backups
Re: pg_basebackup for streaming base backups |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 14:49, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 13:43 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> Downthread you say that this tool is also useful for making base >> backups >> > independent of replication functionality. Sounds good. But then >> the >> > documentation says that the connection must be with a user that has >> the >> > replication permission. Something is conceptually wrong here: why >> would >> > I have to grant replication permission just to take a base backup >> for >> > the purpose of making a backup? >> >> It uses the replication features for it. You also have to set >> max_walsenders > 0, which is in the replication section of the >> postgresql.conf file. >> >> The point I wanted to make downthread was that it's useful without >> having a replication *slave*. But yes, you need the master. > > Suggest calling this utility pg_replication_backup > and the other utility pg_replication_stream > > It will be easier to explain the connection with replication. Hmm. I don't like those names at all :( But that's just me - and I don't totally hate them. So I'm opening the floor for other peoples votes :-) -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: