Re: explaining "context" column of pg_settings
От | Josh Kupershmidt |
---|---|
Тема | Re: explaining "context" column of pg_settings |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTim-L4kff5vovmdx5RS21fPYdzYNw6g4iay6ahXh@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: explaining "context" column of pg_settings (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: explaining "context" column of pg_settings
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com> writes: > I did some work on this patch and attach an updated version. Thanks for taking a look at this. Your version is much more clear. > I'm not > however convinced that it's a good idea to bury this material in > catalogs.sgml --- I think few people ever read that chapter. Shouldn't > we put this into config.sgml instead, somewhere in section 18.1? Yeah, that seems like a better place for this text. >> I avoided just copy-pasting from guc.h, particulary because some of >> the explanations struck me as confusing or incorrect. > > Well, your replacement explanations seemed even less correct ;-). > Also, I think what the text needs to emphasize is *how* to change > each setting type, so that prompted some of my editing. One piece in my patch which isn't in your version is this bit: + ... You may also + send a <systemitem>SIGHUP</systemitem> to an individual backend to cause + only that backend to reload <filename>postgresql.conf</filename>. I was rather surprised when I learned this from the description in guc.h of SIGHUP options. I tested by altering "full_page_writes" in postgresql.conf and sending a SIGHUP to one backend, and sure enough that backend picked up the change but new backends didn't. Unless this feature is documented somewhere else, I think it would be helpful to keep a snippet like this. Josh
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: