Re: READ ONLY fixes
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: READ ONLY fixes |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTim+SH3EH5nO6A+x9=YzAKsBUcev1CF+J9_JcGhE@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: READ ONLY fixes ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: > >> Upon further review, I am wondering if it wouldn't be simpler and >> more logical to allow idempotent changes of these settings at any >> time, and to restrict only changes that actually change something. > > I don't care a lot about that either -- if I remember correctly, we > got here based largely on my somewhat tentative interpretation of the > standard. Even if my reading was right (of which I'm far from sure), > it would just mean that we have an extension to the standard in > allowing the benign declarations. I'm sure not going to lose any > sleep over that. > > I'll do whatever people want in this regard with no reservations. OK, I've committed this as proposed above. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: