Re: Reworks of DML permission checks
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Reworks of DML permission checks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTiltWQpkqt-uvbWMZG6TeEy34AnVJhSIV98L6lKM@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Reworks of DML permission checks (KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Reworks of DML permission checks
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2010/6/14 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>: > The attached patch tries to rework DML permission checks. > > It was mainly checked at the ExecCheckRTEPerms(), but same logic was > implemented in COPY TO/FROM statement and RI_Initial_Check(). > > This patch tries to consolidate these permission checks into a common > function to make access control decision on DML permissions. It enables > to eliminate the code duplication, and improve consistency of access > controls. This patch is listed on the CommitFest page, but I'm not sure if it represents the latest work on this topic. At a minimum, it needs to be rebased. I am not excited about moving ExecCheckRT[E]Perms to some other place in the code. It seems to me that will complicate back-patching with no corresponding advantage. I'd suggest we not do that. The COPY and RI code can call ExecCheckRTPerms() where it is. Maybe at some point we will have a grand master plan for how this should all be laid out, but right now I'd prefer localized changes. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: