Re: Invalid YAML output from EXPLAIN
От | Dean Rasheed |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Invalid YAML output from EXPLAIN |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTili-wQbRsrhutJoSvTy1EQWCv7TSDLqhRyRickJ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Invalid YAML output from EXPLAIN (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Invalid YAML output from EXPLAIN
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 9 June 2010 14:14, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> w= rote: >> On 9 June 2010 03:48, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >>> please test. >> >> Well your patch definitely fixes my original bug, and AFAICT always >> produces valid YAML output now. I've only found one case where a >> particular parser has difficulty parsing the output, and you'd have to >> write a pretty perverse query to hit that case. > > Excellent. > >> So that just leaves this sort of thing: >> >> explain (format yaml) select * from foo as "123"; >> =A0 =A0 =A0 QUERY PLAN >> ------------------------- >> =A0- Plan: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0+ >> =A0 =A0 Node Type: Seq Scan+ >> =A0 =A0 Relation Name: foo + >> =A0 =A0 Alias: 123 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 + >> =A0 =A0 Startup Cost: 0.00 + >> =A0 =A0 Total Cost: 23.10 =A0+ >> =A0 =A0 Plan Rows: 1310 =A0 =A0+ >> =A0 =A0 Plan Width: 32 >> (1 row) >> >> Does anyone care that Alias will sometimes be a string, and sometimes a = number? >> >> ITSM that, since postgresql knows that it's a string, it ought to >> output something that parsers can unambiguously treat as a string too. >> >> But this is also a pretty obscure case that probably only someone >> deliberately trying to be awkward would do (which is me, with my >> tester hat on :-)). > > I guess we could do this by (a) conditionalizing the YAML case in > ExplainProperty() in the same way that the JSON case is currently > conditionalized, and (b) changing the first if statement in > escape_yaml() to set needs_quoting =3D true unless the first character > is alphabetic or an underscore. > Yes, I think that would do it. > By the way, can I ask why you're not just using the JSON format for > this? =A0I mean, I'm glad you are, because it exposed a bug that we got > fixed before release, but it seems a little masochistic...! > Actually I doubt that I will use this feature at all! I only use EXPLAIN from psql, and usually I'm the only one who needs to read it, so the TEXT format will remain my preferred option. I was just doing some random beta testing, working through the list of cool new features. Dean
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: