Re: trace_recovery_messages

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fujii Masao
Тема Re: trace_recovery_messages
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTilhOhiC3p5SOQz0R2XZrtGNBImxaRX7BRKq18a4@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: trace_recovery_messages  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: trace_recovery_messages
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes:
>> We should make trace_recovery_messages available only when
>> the WAL_DEBUG macro was defined?
>
> No, because it's used in a lot of other contexts besides that.
>
>> Currently it's always
>> available, so the standby seems to call elog() too frequently.
>
> Where?  I don't see very many messages that would actually get emitted
> at the default setting of the parameter.

Yes. I was just concerned that frequent calls themselves may increase
the overhead.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: