Re: Performance problem in textanycat/anytextcat
От | Jaime Casanova |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance problem in textanycat/anytextcat |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTilgZLUvJ0MnSIZy1jSeCk0kF31fVNgnh5RcsrJH@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Performance problem in textanycat/anytextcat (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Performance problem in textanycat/anytextcat
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Is it reasonable to fix this now, and if so should I bump catversion >>> or leave it alone? My own preference is to fix it in pg_proc.h but >>> not touch catversion; but you could argue that different ways. > >> are you planning to backpatch this? > > I wasn't planning to; as you say, without field complaints it doesn't > seem compelling to fix in existing releases. > ok, then is up to you if you think that it is worth an initdb in beta... i still think is excessive... btw, is it worth documenting that somewhere for older releases? -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: