Re: Explicit psqlrc
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Explicit psqlrc |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTileEVPTJ79UR6TWtIhTxl2ltD8kY-tWXW6cQbFs@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Explicit psqlrc (gabrielle <gorthx@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Explicit psqlrc
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:17 AM, gabrielle <gorthx@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> Well, that might be a good idea, too, but my expectation is that: >> >> psql -f one -f two -f three >> >> ought to behave in a manner fairly similar to: >> >> cat one two three > all >> psql -f all >> >> and it sounds like with this patch that's far from being the case. > > Correct. Each is handled individually. > > Should I continue to check on ON_ERROR_ROLLBACK results, or bounce > this back to the author? It doesn't hurt to continue to review and find other problems so that the author can try to fix them all at once, but it certainly seems clear that it's not ready to commit at this point, so it definitely needs to go back to the author for a rework. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: