Re: Synchronization levels in SR

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> There already is a first patch to the community that implements quorum
> commit, just not by you.

Yeah, AFAIK, that patch includes also per-standby setting.

> If you have a better way, describe it in detail and in full now, with
> reference to each of the use cases you mentioned, so that people get a
> chance to give their opinions on your design. Then we can let the
> community decide whether or not that second way is actually better. We
> may not need a second patch.

See http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-05/msg01407.php

But I think that we should focus on "per-standby" setting at first.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center