Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp HEAD as 9.1devel.

On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>>> Stamp HEAD as 9.1devel.
>>> (And there was much rejoicing.)
>
>> /me opens a beer.
>
>> How long should I wait before I start breaking things?
>
> Did you have any particular breakage in mind?
>
> I'm hesitant to have a whole lot of variance between REL9_0_STABLE and
> HEAD just yet, since we'll surely be doing a lot of double-patching for
> awhile.  Localized patches, no problem, but this might not be the best
> time to s/foo/bar/g or something like that.

Well, you can see for yourself what I've submitted for the next CF.
As those things get reviewed, I'd like to get them committed; many of
them need follow-on patches in which I don't want to invest too much
effort until the initial patches go in.  And then, too, other people
have also submitted patches which I will be working on also.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company