Re: Negative result with (now()-previously_inserted_timestamp)
От | Gurjeet Singh |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Negative result with (now()-previously_inserted_timestamp) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTilUsmZliAJCXnDm6Rr1d5Xr16s4SPC3a2U-4r0q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Negative result with (now()-previously_inserted_timestamp) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Negative result with (now()-previously_inserted_timestamp)
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com> writes: > > I ran the following query, and got an unexpected negative value. Does > this > > imply that SELECT-transaction was able to see a row created by > > INSERT-transaction which started after the SELECT-transaction? > > Was the SELECT inside a BEGIN block? > No. I have the psql session still open so can confirm that with absolute confidence. If you must know, this instance is on a low-cost, hosted, Xen virtual machine. By any chance, can we suspect the timer accuracy here? Or possibly an NTP server foul-play! Regards, -- gurjeet.singh @ EnterpriseDB - The Enterprise Postgres Company http://www.EnterpriseDB.com singh.gurjeet@{ gmail | yahoo }.com Twitter/Skype: singh_gurjeet Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: