Re: Feedback on 9.0 release text? Please?
От | Thom Brown |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Feedback on 9.0 release text? Please? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTilEAU6Pcrlr4BrB0EhB6rl1Q9Ku0xsYYwYSOfBX@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Feedback on 9.0 release text? Please? (Rob Napier <rob@doitonce.net.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: Feedback on 9.0 release text? Please?
Re: Feedback on 9.0 release text? Please? |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 11 July 2010 22:05, Rob Napier <rob@doitonce.net.au> wrote: > Josh > > I made two changes as outlined below. I have no other issues with it. I > think it reads well. > > On 11/7/10 4:11 AM, "Josh Berkus" <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > >> We use the term "update release" to refer to patches and security fixes, >> so I don't think we want to use "update" here. > > The repetition is not THAT serious so let's leave the first para as it is. > >> >>> PostgreSQL 9.0 also includes more than a dozen other major improvements >>> enhancing every aspect of <<<building/HUH?>>> database applications, >>> including <<</:>>> 64-bit Windows support, conditional and per-column >>> triggers, deferrable unique constraints, and high-performance event >>> messaging. For a complete list of features, see our release information >>> page (link). >> >> Hmmm. I suppose "building" isn't strictly necessary, and if >> unnecessary, should be cut. > > Does this read better? > > PostgreSQL 9.0 includes more than a dozen other major improvements that will > enhance every aspect of database application design and performance, > including: 64-bit Windows support, conditional and per-column triggers, > deferrable unique constraints, and high-performance event messaging. For a > complete list of new features, see our release information page (link). > >>> Thanks to the contributions of developers and companies around the >>> world, such as NTT Open Source, EnterpriseDB, 2ndQuadrant, Red Hat and >>> many others, development and <<<adoption momentum/HUH?>>> is greater >>> than ever. >> >> Yeah, I had trouble with the phrasing there and could use some help. >> What I really wanted to say is that our project momentum, both for >> developing features and for user adoption, is higher/faster than ever. >> Thoughts? >> >> Also, if anyone knows a big-name company who contributed a major feature >> to 9.0 that I'm not thinking of, please mention them now. > > I like Evan’s suggestion for this para: > > Thanks to the contributions of developers and companies around the world, > such as NTT Open Source, EnterpriseDB, 2ndQuadrant, Red Hat and many others, > user adoption and development momentum is greater than ever. > > Regards > > Rob Napier > > homepage: www.oncetechnologies.com > > So is this now ready to go for today's update? Thom
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: