Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTil87FpZ7LwY-GgqzZbHbtgVipVieo5Fa9-Af4g8@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > If someone wants to suggest that HS is useless if max_standby_delay > supports only boolean values, I am ready to suggest we remove HS as well > and head to 9.0 because that would suggest that HS itself is going to be > useless. I think HS is going to be a lot less useful than many people think, at least in 9.0. But I think ripping out max_standby_delay will make it worse. > The code will not be thrown away; we will bring it back for 9.1. If that's the case, then taking it out makes no sense. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: