Re: sql/med review - problems with patching
От | Itagaki Takahiro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: sql/med review - problems with patching |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTil4qdrAJbPToDzhfmtSOLVzUm9qVliFkqhgXDL-@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Fwd: sql/med review - problems with patching (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: sql/med review - problems with patching
Re: sql/med review - problems with patching |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2010/7/14 Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>: > please, can you refresh patch, please? Updated patch attached. The latest version is always in the git repo. http://repo.or.cz/w/pgsql-fdw.git (branch: fdw) I'm developing the patch on postgres' git repo. So, regression test for dblink might fail because of out-of-sync issue between cvs and git. > When I looked to documentation I miss a some tutorial for foreign > tables. There are only reference. I miss some paragraph where is > cleanly and simple specified what is possible now and whot isn't > possible. Enhancing of dblink isn't documented Sure. I'll start to write documentation when we agree the design of FDW. > In function pgIterate(ForeignScanState *scanstate) you are iterare > via pg result. I am thinking so using a cursor and fetching multiple > rows should be preferable. Sure, but I'm thinking that it will be improved after libpq supports protocol-level cursor. The libpq improvement will be applied much more applications including postgresql_fdw. -- Itagaki Takahiro
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: