Re: locking issue on simple selects?
От | Tobias Brox |
---|---|
Тема | Re: locking issue on simple selects? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikzssP3AKeQhM+tB_8tScRGs2iGSqTJJUg2w3DP@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: locking issue on simple selects? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: locking issue on simple selects?
Re: locking issue on simple selects? Re: locking issue on simple selects? |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 15 September 2010 15:39, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > An exclusive lock will block selects too. Have you looked into pg_locks > for ungranted lock requests? Well - I thought so, we have a logging script that logs the content of the pg_locks table, it didn't log anything interesting but it may be a problem with the script itself. It does an inner join on pg_locks.relation = pg_class.oid but when I check now this join seems to remove most of the rows in the pg_locks table. Does it make sense at all to join pg_class with pg_locks? I will ask the sysadm to change to an outer join as for now.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: