Re: multiset patch review
От | Itagaki Takahiro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: multiset patch review |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikya-j2Ty-aN+pQ4eFr8rxbh83aNdR8xoLk4TpX@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: multiset patch review (Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: multiset patch review
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 17:39, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com> wrote: > BTW, should we use an "operator" to represent SUBMULTISET OF ? I did it in the attached patch. Also, I fixed a bug of NULL checks in SUBMULTISET OF operator. Now SUBMULTISET OF is an alias to the new <& operator. We also have &> operator as the commutator. They are different from <@ and @> operators because they considers the number of elements. For example: =# SELECT ARRAY[1,1] <@ ARRAY[1], ARRAY[1,1] <& ARRAY[1]; ?column? | ?column? ----------+---------- t | f (1 row) GIN still doesn't support <& and &> operators because of NULL handling. In the spec, all values including NULLs should be returned for an empty array key (i.e, "WHERE ARRAY[] SUBMULTISET OF array_col" returns everything), but the current GIN implementation won't return NULL values for non-NULL keys. Since it requires changes in GIN, I'd like to postpone gin support to the next development cycle for 9.2. -- Itagaki Takahiro
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: