Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTikuy5eYqNqcOQ1pCidDH6xtUTbzTLdo7fCqBGvD@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered (Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz> wrote: > On 21/01/11 15:24, Robert Haas wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Kevin Grittner >> <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote: >>> >>> Right -- God only knows the number of things were filtered out to >>> leave me with filtered water. What's "filtered" in this case is what >>> was passed through, not what was removed. >> >> Hmm, I guess I see your point now. Well, I'm not wedded to the name, >> but I don't like removed any better. >> >> Rows eliminated? >> > > Rows filtered *out* ? Seems like Tom just had the same thought. Works for me. I'm still not thrilled with the proposed formatting, but I can probably live with it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: