Re: Issues with Quorum Commit
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Issues with Quorum Commit |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikuu3PrarLUV=TtTqeLwqxN6pMUwEnzY_Uf2fAk@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Issues with Quorum Commit (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Issues with Quorum Commit
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > No. Synchronous replication does not help with availability. It allows you > to achieve zero data loss, ie. if the master dies, you are guaranteed that > any transaction that was acknowledged as committed, is still committed. Hmm.. but we can increase availability without any data loss by using synchronous replication. Many people have already been using synchronous replication softwares such as DRBD for that purpose. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: