Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2?
| От | Dave Page |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTikuIAGyF_GOGYTGmMS131M_Y9Vw6P6hvA-Ptd02@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2?
Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2? |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: >> Dave Page wrote: >>> Shouldn't we have bumped the catversion? The installers can't tell >>> that beta1 clusters won't work with beta2 :-( > >> That is an interesting point. Tom bumped the pg_control version, but >> not the catalog version. > > Right, because the catalog contents didn't change. Seems to me you'd > better teach the installers to look at PG_CONTROL_VERSION too. Hmm, is there anything else that might need to be checked? -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: