Re: Vacuum full warning
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Vacuum full warning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTiktjPjy0zw+zGxT0tuPb72nhSit7cagKbXHqcOD@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Vacuum full warning (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Vacuum full warning
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 15:11, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 15:01, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 13:30, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 13:22, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: >>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> I came across yet another case of "i did vacuum full because it seemed >>>>>>>> like a good idea" today.. Urgh. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What do you guys think of a patch like the attached, which throws a >>>>>>>> warning when you run vacuum full from the maintenance dialog on a >>>>>>>> pre-9.0 version? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Something like that should be a guru hint shouldn't it? >>>>>> >>>>>> Hmm. That might be an idea. I always turn those off because the >>>>>> majority of them are just annoying ;) >>>>>> >>>>>> Where the heck is the *source* for the guru hints stored? >>>>> >>>>> docs/xxxx/hints. >>>> >>>> Meh. So why didn't mym "git grep" find that.. *annoyance*. >>>> >>>> Anyway. Something like this, then? Am I missing something still? >>> >>> At least a change to the installer source to add the new file. Do we >>> need something for Makefile.am as well, or are we using a wildcard >>> there? >> >> Ah, wasn't aware we used the installer from there. But yeah, other >> ones are in the wxs file - will go add there. >> >> Makefile.am appears to be using a wildcard, yes. >> >> Q: what's our taken on batckpatching something like this to 1.12? > > Hmm, well it's not really a bug - but it's hard to call it a feature > either, and it certainly seems like it might help people avoid > expensive mistakes. It's also not at all invasive, so I don't think > I'd object. Hmm. One thing to check: adding a file isn't going to break the installer, right? (break == cause annoyance) -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: