Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTiktHw60jeEF9rJ2jdc3y9GEOGPWTkkahc_jlUfZ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I already explained that killing the startup process first is a bad idea > for many reasons when shutdown was discussed. Can't remember who added > the new standby shutdown code recently, but it sounds like their design > was pretty poor if it didn't include shutting down properly with HS. I > hope they fix the bug they have introduced. HS was never designed to > work that way, so there is no flaw there; it certainly worked when > committed. New smart shutdown during recovery doesn't kill the startup process until all of the read only backends have gone away. So it works fine with HS. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: