Re: scheduling
От | Alex Hunsaker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: scheduling |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTiktGa9FcMHzd1pSTAFPEnHWm=z7HKgsfyHEBFnt@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | scheduling (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 20:13, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > Do we have a projected data for the next 9.0 wrap, and will it be > beta5 or rc1? How much should we worry about the remaining open > items? If we are taking a vote, I +1 for rc1 :). > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.0_Open_Items > > I am inclined to say that all three of the items currently on the list > need to be addressed in some way before we move forward... or at least > the last two. > > * ExplainOnePlan handles snapshots differently than ProcessQuery Isn't this one not specific to 9.0? If so I don't think it should be a "blocker". > * Backup procedure is wrong? This *sounds* like a documentation bug, seems like something we can fix while in -rc to me.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: