Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikqz+P=qnNpAOhighZPhsjz_-iiwzOq6xPwJk1Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2010/8/7 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes: >> On Aug 6, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: >>> so there is only small step to proposed feature >>> SELECT foo(this := 'that', "1" := 4) > >> Sorry, not following you here I would to difference a key and value in notation. > > Pavel doesn't understand "no" ;-) > you are don't writing a stored procedures like me - so maybe you are doesn't understand a my motivation. :). I have to try it. You are rejected almost of all my proposals - named parameters, variadic functions, enhancing of RAISE STATEMENT - and now its in core. But it was a battle :). Try to write a XML-RPC support for PostgreSQL, and try to thinking on programmer comfort, please. I am sure so our support for stored procedures or external procedures are not complete - it is limited by BISON possibilities, and because BISON isn't extensible parser, I am searching other ways. If I can enhance a syntax from external module, I don't talk. Regards Pavel Regards Pavel > regards, tom lane >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: