Re: psql \conninfo command (was: Patch: psql \whoami option)
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql \conninfo command (was: Patch: psql \whoami option) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikptCEqXE45-WDE6LaRitprR4x7BGyy6zCsVJ5C@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql \conninfo command (was: Patch: psql \whoami option) (David Christensen <david@endpoint.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:09 PM, David Christensen <david@endpoint.com> wrote: > > On Jul 21, 2010, at 8:48 PM, Fujii Masao wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> OK, committed. >>>> >>>> When I specify the path of the directory for the Unix-domain socket >>>> as the host, \conninfo doesn't mention that this connection is based >>>> on the Unix-domain socket. Is this intentional? >>>> >>>> $ psql -h"/tmp" -c"\conninfo" >>>> You are connected to database "postgres" on host "/tmp" at port "5432" >>>> as user "postgres". >>>> >>>> I expected that something like >>>> >>>> You are connected to database "postgres" via local socket on >>>> "/tmp" at port "5432" as user "postgres". >>> >>> :-( >>> >>> No, I didn't realize the host field could be used that way. It's true >>> that you get a fairly similar message from \c, but that's not exactly >>> intuitive either. >>> >>> rhaas=# \c - - /tmp - >>> You are now connected to database "rhaas" on host "/tmp". >> >> OK. The attached patch makes \conninfo command emit the following >> message if the host begins with a slash: >> >> $ psql -h/tmp -c"\conninfo" >> You are connected to database "postgres" via local socket on >> "/tmp" at port "5432" as user "postgres". >> >> Similarly, it makes \c command emit the following message in that >> case: >> >> $ psql -hlocalhost -c"\c - - /tmp -" >> You are now connected to database "postgres" via local socket on "/tmp". > > > If we print the local socket when it's been explicitly set via the host= param, why not display the actual socket pathin the general local socket case? Patch? > Also, while we're still tweaking this patch, I've had a couple requests for the SSL status of the connection as well; doesthis seem like a generally useful parameter to display as well? Yes. If we're going to have the command, we might as well get as much mileage out of it as we reasonably can. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: