Re: The first dedicated PostgreSQL forum
| От | LazyTrek |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: The first dedicated PostgreSQL forum |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTikpNn9awSULxfE3Bqwf+LfXUUxRWZfq5nN6UPrJ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: The first dedicated PostgreSQL forum (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: The first dedicated PostgreSQL forum
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
I must say that I come from a generation not used to mailing lists, but have adopted them for PostgreSQL recently.
One of the main things I don't like is that my email address is now out there for crawlers to capture (thanks to the archive) and spam. For this reason I use an alias email address which is a slight shame because I would prefer to use my attributable, professional email address. Do the long standing members not have problems with spam?
One of the main things I don't like is that my email address is now out there for crawlers to capture (thanks to the archive) and spam. For this reason I use an alias email address which is a slight shame because I would prefer to use my attributable, professional email address. Do the long standing members not have problems with spam?
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday 13 November 2010 1:52:11 pm thatsanicehatyouhave@mac.com wrote:You must have hit a batch of slow electrons :) My result:
> I've used lists where the the line between forum and mailing list is
> blurred. See:
>
> http://www.cocoabuilder.com/
>
> This is actually a web interface for a couple of mailing lists, and is a
> great tool for searching past posts. You can't post to the web site though
> - it is strictly a third-party web interface for the lists, but it's my
> first go-to for searching.
>
> I realize you can search this list here:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/
>
> but a more polished web interface of the list I think would satisfy
> everyone.
>
> BTW, I performed a search on that page for the word "replication" and the
> result was very slow ("Searching in 863,821 pages took 25.1127 seconds").
>
> Demitri
"Searching in 863,821 pages took 0.84438 seconds."
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@gmail.com
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: