Re: Allowing multiple concurrent base backups
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Allowing multiple concurrent base backups |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikp1baK60=p4Tgh5C3KvR_PNF3ZsPNQmwBgLSHK@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Allowing multiple concurrent base backups (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Allowing multiple concurrent base backups
Re: Allowing multiple concurrent base backups |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 6:02 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hmm, perhaps the code would be more readable if instead of the > forcePageWrites counter that counts exclusive and non-exclusive backups, and > an exclusiveBackup boolean indicating if one of the in-progress backups is > an exclusive one, we had a counter that only counts non-exclusive backups, > plus a boolean indicating if an exclusive backup is in progress in addition > to them. > > Attached is a patch for that (against master branch, including only xlog.c). I read this patch and previous-posted one. Those look good. Comments: + * do_pg_start_backup is the workhorse of the user-visible pg_stop_backup() + * function. Typo: s/do_pg_start_backup/do_pg_stop_backup It's helpful to explain about this behavior in pg_basebackup.sgml or elsewhere. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: