Re: SQL2011 and writeable CTE
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SQL2011 and writeable CTE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikoM5AO6o5Lh72grkFpVj==RjB0d5GNJd6m6Js1@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SQL2011 and writeable CTE (Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2010/11/8 Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>: > 2010/11/9 Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>: >> 2010/11/8 Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>: >>> 2010/11/8 Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>: >> >>>> Hmm, this looks very different from our writeable CTEs. And I can see >>>> many issues like syntax ambiguity and execution order if we support >>>> it. AFAIK the most significant reason why we are working on CTEs is >>>> that CTEs are regarded as something like materialized table. >>>> >>>> So I think we are going on writeable "CTEs" unless there are no >>>> objection rather than pursuing the standard. >>>> Thanks for sharing anyway. >>>> >>> >>> I found, so writeable CTE was implemented in Microsoft SQL server too. >>> Can be our implementation compatible? >>> >> >> I don't believe MS SQL Server doesn't implement such our writeable > > I mean, "I don't believe it implements..." :) ook :) Pavel > > -- > Hitoshi Harada >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: