Re: How much do the hint bits help?
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How much do the hint bits help? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTiknthijEYAERhd8zNDGrbqhXGMP=Nq=+xaubumR@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: How much do the hint bits help? (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Mark Kirkwood > <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz> wrote: >> On 22/12/10 13:05, Mark Kirkwood wrote: >>> >>> On 22/12/10 11:42, Merlin Moncure wrote: >>>> >>>> Attached is an incomplete patch disabling hint bits based on compile >>>> switch. It's not complete, for example it's not reconciling some >>>> assumptions in heapam.c that hint bits have been set in various >>>> routines. However, it mostly passes regression and I deemed it good >>>> enough to run some preliminary benchmarks and fool around. Obviously, >>>> hint bits are an annoying impediment to a couple of other cool pending >>>> features, and it certainly would be nice to operate without them. >>>> Also, for particular workloads, the extra i/o hint bits can cause a >>>> fair amount of pain. >>> >>> Looks like a great idea to test, however I don't seem to be able to >>> compile with it applied: (set#define DISABLE_HINT_BITS 1 at the end of >>> src/include/pg_config_manual.h) >>> >>> gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith >>> -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -g >>> -I../../../../src/include -D_GNU_SOURCE -c -o heapam.o heapam.c >>> heapam.c: In function ‘HeapTupleHeaderAdvanceLatestRemovedXid’: >>> heapam.c:3867: error: ‘HEAP_XMIN_COMMITTED’ undeclared (first use in this >>> function) >>> heapam.c:3867: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once >>> heapam.c:3867: error: for each function it appears in.) >>> heapam.c:3869: error: ‘HEAP_XMIN_INVALID’ undeclared (first use in this >>> function) >>> make[4]: *** [heapam.o] Error 1 >>> >> >> Arrg, sorry - against git head on Ubuntu 10.03 (gcc 4.4.3) > > did you check to see if the patch applied clean? btw I was working > against postgresql-9.0.1... ah, this is the problem (9.0.1 vs head). to work vs head it prob needs a few more tweaks. you can also try removing it yourself -- most of the changes follow a similar pattern. merlin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: