Re: comment needs to be updated for HS?
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: comment needs to be updated for HS? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTikl9ljg7ujYXEttjLBaaVsTFQk6kWdY6xnaQXav@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: comment needs to be updated for HS? (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 4:20 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> postmaster.c contains the following comment just above the definition >> of PMState. It appears to be out of date: >> >> * After reaching a consistent point in WAL redo, startup process signals >> * us again, and we switch to PM_RECOVERY_CONSISTENT state. There's currently >> * no difference between PM_RECOVERY and PM_RECOVERY_CONSISTENT, but we >> * could start accepting connections to perform read-only queries at this >> * point, if we had the infrastructure to do that. > > But the first sentence of the above seems to be correct and helpful. No? Yes. I was just quoting the whole thing for context. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: